Covid-19, communalism, and Islamophobia: India facing the disease

As threats to human security, epidemics cause fear and anxiety, thus generating conspiracy theories, fake news, and discrimination. In 2020, the most widespread xenophobic reaction to the Covid-19 pandemic was Sinophobia. In comparison, India's response to the pandemic was both conventional and exceptional. Like other countries, India recorded a surge in Sinophobia;but –remarkably– in Islamophobia too. Turning to both history and theory, this paper investigates how Coronavirus got transformed into a ‘Muslim disease' and connected to narratives of holy war and Islamization (‘Corona Jihad'). We contextualize the 2020 Covid-related Islamophobic wave within a longer process of demonization of the Muslim that is catalysed by the beliefs and policies of Hindu nationalism. In light of Muslims' continuing relegation to the fringe of the Indian body-politic, we propose an interpretation of the 2020 disease-induced Islamophobia as scapegoating, based on René Girard's mimetic theory. In conclusion, the case of Covid-19 in India confirms that in divided societies collective threats like epidemics are likely to exacerbate already existing forms of discrimination rooted in the society's mainstream memory and norms, and highlights the role of beliefs in mediating between threat and violence. This case study also highlights the deep penetration of communal discourse in India's everydayness and its far-reaching implications. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Social Identities is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Squaring the Schaverien triangle

Supervision in art therapy is a relationship of learning. It provides opportunities for individuals less experienced in the field to reflect about their practicum work under the guidance of someone more experienced. This chapter covers the psychological effects of virtual art therapy interventions, such as through videoconferencing, which increased with the arrival of the COVID pandemic. It examines the complex ideas of virtual art psychotherapy and its virtual healing qualities since "[i]n analytical psychotherapy ... the main pivot of treatment is transference". Just as Schaverien describes the transference of past experiences as being made "live", the chapter describes how virtual art therapy is "live-online". The interaction with clients through virtual means provides the therapists with new opportunities, such as meeting clients in their own space or allowing a digital method, like the Zoom Whiteboard, for clients to create art without having to buy art materials. The use of the Schaverien Talisman and Scapegoat concepts can be applied in a more intimate way by meeting clients virtually at their own home. Thus, with the added virtual element to therapy, we are squaring the Schaverien triangle. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Revisiting Manhattan Music in the Time of COVID-19: Body Politics, Anti-Asian Racism and Negotiation of Ethnic Identity

The rise in COVID-19 cases has not only generated anxiety and uncertainty but has also caused an upsurge in anti-Asian racism all over the world. The racially motivated attacks have forced us to rethink the concept of migration, integration, and racism in a global context. In this paper, I look back at Meena Alexander’s Manhattan Music and relying on Arjun Appadurai’s critical theory in Fear of Small Numbers: An Essay on the Geography of Anger I investigate the dynamics that go into making the dominant culture hostile towards immigrants and ethnic populations. Drawing a connection between my reading of the novel and the COVID-fueled racism, I debunk the myth of assimilation as a means of integration and attest that race and ethnicity still play crucial role in the politics of power. That is, despite the ethnic protagonists’ negotiation of their subjectivity, their ethnic body will continue to be victims of racial politics and used as scapegoats as long as white supremacy prevails and is considered normative. Revisiting Manhattan Music and rendering the connection between race, ethnicity and racism opens up avenues for critical rethinking and compels us to ever more consider the intersection of ethnic identity and race today in an era of global pandemic that has targeted Asian migrants in and beyond America. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Journal of Intercultural Studies is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

The “elderly” during the covid-19 crisis: a convenient scapegoat or a revelation of social dysfunction?

With the arrival of the coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) pandemic, the French society has been deeply shaken in its overall functioning. The proliferation of patients and the increased demand for care, particularly in hospitals and intensive care units, have particularly disrupted the health and social functioning of French society. In this particular context of crisis, the latter played the role of “social analyzer” in the sense given to it by sociologists, that is to say, it shed new light on the social practices instituted normally. We have chosen for this article to examine the way in which a particular category of people “the elderly” had been treated on three registers which appeared to us to be emblematic of the social treatment of these “elderly people” during the covid-19 crisis. First there was the reactivation of what some have called “the struggle of ages” or even the war of generations. Then, this crisis has particularly highlighted the situation of elderly people residing in nursing homes: their increased mortality, their problematic confinement and their priority vaccination. Finally, this crisis raised the question of the relevance of setting up specific confinement according to age. Our conclusion is that crises are conducive to simplistic explanations and the search for scapegoats, but that they are also a formidable indicator of social dysfunctions that predate the crisis. In this sense, the crisis has brought to light an obvious fact in French society of the primacy of “life course inequalities” as a major vector of social exclusion. © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS Avec l'arrivée de la pandémie de coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19), la société française a été profondément ébranlée dans son fonctionnement global. La multiplication des malades et l'augmentation de la demandes de soins notamment hospitaliers et en services de réanimation ont particulièrement perturbé le fonctionnement sanitaire et social de la société française. Dans ce contexte particulier de crise, cette dernière a joué le rôle d’ « analyseur social » au sens que lui donnent les sociologues, c'est-à-dire qu'elle a été porteuse d'un éclairage nouveau sur les pratiques sociales instituées en temps normal. Nous avons choisi pour cet article d'examiner la façon dont avait été traitée une catégorie particulière de personnes « les personnes âgées » et ce sur trois registres qui nous sont apparus emblématiques du traitement social de ces « personnes âgées » pendant la crise covid-19. D'abord il y a eu la réactivation de ce que d'aucuns ont appelé « la lutte des âges » ou encore la guerre des générations. Ensuite cette crise a particulièrement mis en lumière la situation des personnes âgées résidant en EHPAD : leur mortalité accrue, leur confinement problématique et leur vaccination prioritaire. Enfin cette crise a posé la question de la pertinence d'une mise en place d'un confinement spécifique en fonction de l’âge. Notre conclusion est que les crises sont propices aux explications simplistes et à la recherche de boucs émissaires, mais qu'elles sont aussi un formidable révélateur des dysfonctionnements sociaux antérieurs à la crise. En ce sens la crise a remis en lumière une évidence, dans la société française, la primauté des « inégalités de parcours de vie » comme vecteur majeur de l'exclusion sociale. © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS

IMMIGRANTS AS VICTIMS OF THE SCAPEGOAT MECHANISM IN THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC.

In the COVID-19 pandemic, the strategy of constructing the disease as a threat caused by foreigners, and attempts to put the blame on the "other" went hand in hand with the outbreak. The accusatory index fingers were mostly aimed at immigrants. The xenophobic rhetoric that immigrants are potential carriers of the virus and pose a deadly health threat has become a central theme for populist politicians advocating curbing immigration. Under the pretext of containing the spread of the virus, some governments have instrumentalized the pandemic to justify strict immigration policies towards immigrants. This article attempts to provide a theoretical explanation of the tendency to scapegoat immigrants in crises. In addition, the news reports from reliable media organizations and the publications prepared by international organizations are examined and the practices of blaming immigrants for COVID-19 are evaluated. The study reveals that some politicians scapegoated immigrants by instrumentalizing COVID-19 to legitimize anti-immigration and these politicians, who were determined to have populist nationalist tendencies, used metaphors such as war, enemy, invasion in their discourses in order to construct the outbreak as an external threat. The study also displays that the tendency to blame immigrants is based on historical and cultural prejudices and that the infodemic is one of the most important factors that ignite the scapegoat mechanism. (English) [ FROM AUTHOR] COVID-19 pandemisinde, hastalığı yabancıların yol açtığı bir tehdit olarak inşa etme stratejisi ve suçu "öteki"nin sırtına yükleme girişimleri salgınla el ele yürüdü. Suçlayıcı işaret parmakları çoğunlukla göçmenlere yöneldi. Göçmenlerin virüsün potansiyel taşıyıcıları olduğuna ve ölümcül bir sağlık tehdidi oluşturduğuna dair yabancı düşmanı retorik, göçü engellemeyi savunan popülist politikacılar için merkezi bir tema haline geldi. Bazı hükümetler, virüsün yayılmasını kontrol altına alma bahanesiyle, göçmenlere yönelik katı göç politikalarını meşrulaştırmak için pandemiyi araçsallaştırdı. Bu makale, kriz dönemlerinde göçmenleri günah keçisi yapma eğiliminin kuramsal bir açıklamasını sunmaya çalışmaktadır. Ayrıca güvenilir medya kuruluşlarından gelen haber raporlarını ve uluslararası örgütler tarafından hazırlanan yayınları inceleyerek COVID-19 için göçmenleri suçlama pratiklerini değerlendirmektedir. Çalışma, bazı politikacıların, göçmen karşıtlığına meşruiyet kazandırmak için COVID-19'u araçsallaştırarak göçmenleri günah keçisi yaptıklarını;popülist milliyetçi eğilimlere sahip oldukları belirlenen bu politikacıların salgını bir dış tehdit olarak inşa etmek amacıyla söylemlerinde savaş, düşman, istila gibi metaforlar kullandıklarını;göçmenleri suçlama eğiliminin tarihsel ve kültürel ön yargılara dayandığını ve infodeminin günah keçisi mekanizmasını ateşleyen en önemli faktörlerden biri olduğunu gözler önüne sermektedir. (Turkish) [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi is the property of Pamukkale University, Social Sciences Institute and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Taking control of violence against doctors

Violence against healthcare professionals is a serious but understudied global problem and one that lacks evidence-based solutions. The current research offers a novel explanation and intervention for addressing this issue: We propose that low feelings of control among patients and their family members play an important role in shaping doctor-patient relationships. To regain a sense of control, we suggest that patients attribute responsibility to doctors for their suffering, which may in turn lead to aggressive behavioural intentions against one's doctors. We conducted three studies to understand whether individuals with low perceived control blame doctors more, and whether threats to their sense of control cause participants to attribute more responsibility to doctors. Study 1 found that feelings of lack of control were an important predictor of attributing responsibility for negative illness-related incidents to doctors in a manner consistent with blame. Study 2 specified that the chaotic and unpredictable nature of illness, and not just its negative valence, is what drives attributions of increased responsibility to doctors. Study 3, which utilized a field setting in hospitals, found that an experimental intervention to increase feelings of control decreased frustration against (Study 3a/3b) and intention to harm doctors (Study 3b). These findings suggest that increasing feelings of control among patients can improve patient-doctor relationships. We also discuss the role of control and scapegoating during the COVID-19 pandemic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

Les « personnes âgées » pendant la crise du Covid-19: un bouc émissaire commode ou un révélateur des dysfonctionnement sociaux?

Résumé Avec l’arrivée de la pandémie Covid-19, la société française a été profondément ébranlée dans son fonctionnement global. La multiplication des malades et l’augmentation de la demandes de soins notamment hospitaliers et en services de réanimation ont particulièrement perturbé le fonctionnement sanitaire et social de la société française. Dans ce contexte particulier de crise, cette dernière a joué le rôle d’ « analyseur social » au sens que lui donnent les sociologues, c’est-à-dire qu’elle a été porteuse d’un éclairage nouveau sur les pratiques sociales instituées en temps normal. Nous avons choisi pour cet article d’examiner la façon dont avait été traitée une catégorie particulière de personnes « les personnes âgées » et ce sur trois registres qui nous sont apparus emblématiques du traitement social de ces « personnes âgées » pendant la crise Covid-19. D’abord il y a eu la réactivation de ce que d’aucuns ont appelé « la lutte des âges » ou encore la guerre des générations. Ensuite cette crise a particulièrement mis en lumière la situation des personnes âgées résidant en EHPAD : leur mortalité accrue, leur confinement problématique et leur vaccination prioritaire. Enfin cette crise a posé la question de la pertinence d’une mise en place d’un confinement spécifique en fonction de l’âge. Notre conclusion est que les crises sont propices aux explications simplistes et à la recherche de boucs émissaires, mais qu’elles sont aussi un formidable révélateur des dysfonctionnements sociaux antérieurs à la crise. En ce sens la crise a remis en lumière une évidence, dans la société française, la primauté des «  inégalités de parcours de vie » comme vecteur majeur de l’exclusion sociale. Summary With the arrival of the Covid-19 pandemic, French society has been deeply shaken in its overall functioning. The proliferation of patients and the increased demand for care, particularly in hospitals and intensive care units, have particularly disrupted the health and social functioning of French society. In this particular context of crisis, the latter played the role of "social analyzer" in the sense given to it by sociologists, that is to say, it shed new light on the social practices instituted normally. We have chosen for this article to examine the way in which a particular category of people "the elderly" had been treated on three registers which appeared to us to be emblematic of the social treatment of these "elderly people" during the Covid-19 crisis. First there was the reactivation of what some have called “the struggle of ages‿ or even the war of generations. Then, this crisis has particularly highlighted the situation of elderly people residing in nursing homes: their increased mortality, their problematic confinement and their priority vaccination. Finally, this crisis raised the question of the relevance of setting up specific confinement according to age. Our conclusion is that crises are conducive to simplistic explanations and the search for scapegoats, but that they are also a formidable indicator of social dysfunctions that predate the crisis. In this sense, the crisis has brought to light an obvious fact in French society of the primacy of “life course inequalities‿ as a major vector of social exclusion.

Stigma and blame related to COVID-19 pandemic: A case-study of editorial cartoons in Canada.

The COVID-19 pandemic represents not only the spread of a highly contagious and potentially fatal virus, but also an outbreak of theories, rumors, discourses and representations trying to make sense of a crisis. In this article, we explore the issue of blame and stigma in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. We do so by studying editorial cartoons published about COVID-19 in ten mainstream Canadian newspapers between January 2020 and March 2021. We identified 203 editorial cartoons that highlight common discourses which blame or stigmatize specific groups of people for the origin or transmission of COVID-19, or for their behavior during the pandemic. The cartoons focused on four groups: 1) people of Chinese origin or descent and of other national/geographic provenance (Americans, Canadians from specific provinces, urban residents); 2) international travelers; 3) people who do not respect the preventive measures to contain the pandemic; and 4) people who question or criticize the scientific discourses about COVID-19. Our analysis revealed an "othering process" common in times of pandemic. Our analysis of editorial cartoons in Canada also uncovered a moralization around the respect of the counter measures against COVID-19. These editorial cartoons largely divide the population into two groups: 1) "virtuous" people who are "selfless" and "smart" and who respect the public health preventive measures; 2) those who are "immoral", "self-centered", "silly" and even "stupid", who do not respect the recommended measures to prevent the transmission of COVID-19. While negatively portraying these individuals may help promote adherence to the recommended measures, it also can exacerbate polarization. Analyzing editorial cartoons can be a useful approach to rapidly gather information on attitudes and feelings in the public at a specific time and place.